Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA03190; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from colin.muc.de (root@colin.muc.de [193.174.4.1]) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA03072 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 22:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from en by colin.muc.de with UUCP id <86019-2>; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 07:05:49 +0200 Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.8.2) for new-httpd@apache.org id VAA01015; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 21:07:28 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199708051907.VAA01015@en1.engelschall.com> Subject: Re: Apache Documentation Project !! In-Reply-To: from Alexei Kosut at "Aug 5, 97 00:06:08 am" To: new-httpd@apache.org (Apache Developer ML) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 21:07:28 +0200 From: rse@engelschall.com (Ralf S. Engelschall) Organization: Engelschall, Germany. X-Home: http://www.engelschall.com/ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Hello Alexei Kosut, in a previous mail you wrote: > > Really cool would be to have the doc's in PDF format ! I like pdf because > > it's easy > > to manouvre around the doc, and the print-out is book quality. > > Html is nice for an online ref. doc, but not for something to read a lot. > > Pdf is a BMW 8 series compared with Html which is merely a Geo Metro when > > it > > comes to doc's. > > But HTML has one great advantage; it's portable, it's well-known, and > it's easy to edit for everyone. The original docs were written in SGML, > and David Robinson translated them to HTML and PostScript. But we dropped > the SGML version about ten minutes after he wrote them, because no one > wanted to maintain them. We're all web folk, we can all do HTML. > > If people want to run the HTML files through a HTML-to-PostScript or > HTML-to-PDF or HTML-to-AmigaWord 0.7 converter, that's fine with me, but > I think we should definitedly keep the source docs in HTML. SGML is not nice when one uses all its features, but the handbook I started uses the LinuxDoc-DTD and the used commands/tags are just a few and they are very similar to HTML. So when a HTML-hacker says he is unable to use this SGML dialect he actually just don't want to use it. The language is easy. And the advantage: There are only tags left for structuring, because all other HTML stuff is _generated_. Greetings, Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com