httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: OS abstraction
Date Thu, 21 Aug 1997 21:57:17 GMT
No I'm suggesting it for an entire module.

Dean

On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Ben Laurie wrote:

> Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Paul Sutton wrote:
> > 
> > > complex than this, and Dean has suggested we use inlineable functions
> > > rather than complex and possibly side-effect causing macros.
> > 
> > Where possible, inline would be great.  The difficulty with inline is
> > when you need to include the code in headers, and you need to also provide
> > a version which is not inlined... and you want the two to be the same.
> > How grossed out would people be if we had stuff like:
> 
> I'd be considerably less grossed out if you didn't seem to be suggesting
> a file for each function. Other than that, I'm not above #including .cs.
> :-)
> 
> BTW, did I ever mention C++? :->
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben.
> 
> -- 
> Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435|Apache Group member
> Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472|http://www.apache.org
> and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
> A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
> London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
> 


Mime
View raw message