httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: repository names (was Re: [CFV]: mod_speling revived)
Date Tue, 12 Aug 1997 07:20:20 GMT
Yes you could rename and the process of changing to the new name is pretty
painless.  In fact you could even write a script that whacks all the
CVS/Root (or is it CVS/Repository?) files.  I'd write it... but it won't
fit in the margin ;)

Dean

On Mon, 11 Aug 1997, Paul Sutton wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > So to summarize:
> 
> For some reason this took too long to get to me. Anyway, the current state
> is: 
> 
>   Use "apachen" for HEAD work only (1.3)
>   Use "apache" for the APACHE_1_2_X branch only (the HEAD of this
>      repository is now effectively useless)
> 
> Given that, I think your suggestions make very much sense, so +1 to all of
> them. Is it relatively safe to just rename apachen to apache-1.3, since
> diffs against apachen's tree work work against a new checked out
> apache-1.3 without munging.
> 
> > - rename apachen to apache-1_3
> > - bring apache-1_3 up to date with latest RCS files from apache
> > - cp apache apache-1_2
> > - do a bunch of rcs crap to convert the 1.2 branch in apache-1_2 into the
> >   HEAD
> > - wait two weeks, vigilantly watching for mistaken commits on apache
> > - make apache read-only
> 
> //pcs
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message