httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] unreadable .htaccess
Date Sun, 24 Aug 1997 22:47:58 GMT
+1 on this patch

Perhaps we should be returning HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED?  Seems that might 
point to the source of the problem best.


> Reposted; minor change since the first posting by adding ENOTDIR.
> 
> I'm interested in if people think HTTP_FORBIDDEN or
> HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR is the more appropriate.  
> 
> My view is that part of the resource is how the .htaccess file says it
> should be presented, so if we can't read the .htaccess we can't read part
> of the resource so forbidden is appropriate.
> 
> If you do server error, then the following situation:
> 
>     $ mkdir ~/public_html/dir
>     $ chmod 700 !$
>     $ lynx http://localhost/~user/dir/
> 
> will give a server error, which is counterintuitive in some ways.  The
> current interpretation of forbidden does not just apply to the final file.
> 
> In any case, I could go for either so majority feedback probably wins.




Mime
View raw message