httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From (Ralf S. Engelschall)
Subject Re: [STATUS] Apache 1.2.2 (Fri 1-Aug-1997 10:49 MET DST)
Date Fri, 01 Aug 1997 19:37:53 GMT

In article <> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:

> Once released, I'd like us to see more effort done in getting 1.3
> at least into a beta phase... Although it doesn't look good to
> have releases spaced _way_ too far apart, iit also doesn't "look"
> good having them on top of one another.

> I agree that 1.2.2 was needed for the bug fixes, but I think 1.2.3
> should be 1.3 :)

While I also want to see 1.3 out there as a beta version, I don't think there
is any need to cut the 1.2 branch. When time comes and more bugs need to be
fixed before 1.3.0(!) is out, of course there should be 1.2.3 or even 1.2.4.
Look at Squid, they have 1.0.22 and 1.1.14. And the 1.0er Squid was fixed as
the stable-branch for a long time until 1.1.0 went out. This way the users
always had a really stable version. While I hope we never need Apache
1.2.22(!) ;-) I think we should not state that we never do any more 1.2.3.
When there is need, we should do it. When not, even better.... :-)

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall

View raw message