Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA01186; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (twinlark.arctic.org [204.62.130.91]) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA01120 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24110 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 1997 17:39:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 10:39:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: solaris HUP blues Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Why don't we just keep sockets open across a HUP like we do for graceful? It would solve both of the solaris HUP problems... and avoid us having to figure out why the HUP problem is solved on my test server with the patch, but not on the two users of PR#888 and PR#896. Can anyone see any problems with this? Dean