Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: [STATUS] 1.3
In-Reply-To: <199707032136.RAA19478@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95dg3.970706172420.17330R-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Every code change that was committed was posted here, and voted on, or was
a PORT that has been listed in the STATUS reports for about 6 months.  If
you don't see the "Reviewed by:" in a 1.2.1 commit there's a chance that
it's listed in the corresponding 1.3 commit -- I was a bit lazy at copying
the same log comments.

Dean

On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Marc Slemko wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > > Pre-1.2.1 the general procedure was to generate a patch and then
> > > post it to the group for a vote. This was very rarely done with 1.2.1
> > 
> > It was from where I stand.  Most of the stuff that wasn't was NT stuff in
> > HEAD...
> > 
> 
> Huh? You saw posts for all the code-patches in diff form ([PATCH])
> and people actually voted on all of them and they weren't committed until
> we had enough votes?
> 
> Not where I stand.
> 
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"
>