Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA06157; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (twinlark.arctic.org [204.62.130.91]) by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA06153 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21330 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 1997 23:34:46 -0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:34:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache/src CHANGES alloc.c alloc.h http_protocol.c http_protocol.h mod_cgi.c util_script.c util_script.h In-Reply-To: <199707061325.JAA02560@devsys.jaguNET.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I would rather not go to the voting system yet. Perhaps I haven't made myself clear in the past: I feel completely constrained to the point of uselessness at times when working on Apache. I have had over the past four weeks, A LOT OF FREE TIME, but much of it has been spent bickering about things rather than implementing something. There is crap that I would implement (like the performance enhancements requiring slight semantic changes in obscure portions of the semantics), but I fear that it will get voted down. That's a larger change than "HostnameLookups off" or "setlocal("",NULL)" in my opinion. We are not in feature freeze. We are not in feature freeze. We are not in feature freeze. We are not in feature freeze. We are not in feature freeze. We are not in feature freeze. Next monday I start a new full-time job. So all that free time I had is over with, and it's too bad. The problem with Apache is that if I do have free time and write something, I probably have to defend it for a week or two afterwards before it would be introduced into the server. I've still got dozens of messages to read from this weekend, so I have no idea where people are on the "1.3 status" thread. But many of those things, and the suspended PRs are Good Things that would suck to get caught in the terminal hell of voting here. How many submitters mention "I submitted this against 1.0.5, 1.1, and 1.2, please please accept it this time"? Dean On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Randy Terbush wrote: > > > > > > Uh, I would like to see some comments regarding this before it is > > commited. Granted I did not veto it, but without some explanation, > > I will. For one thing, it commits code that is commented out with > > #if 0. > > > > I raised several questions for which I saw no answer. > > > > I would like to see us go back to the voting system for 1.3. > > > > Me too (ie: voting). > > PS: Any further votes on the status update patch? > -- > ==================================================================== > Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services > jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ > "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!" >