Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02337;
	Sat, 5 Jul 1997 20:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com (ppp0-sierra.zyzzyva.com [208.214.59.46])
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02332
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Sat, 5 Jul 1997 20:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sierra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com
 (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id WAA10979 for <new-httpd@apache.org>;
 Sat, 5 Jul 1997 22:05:58 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199707060305.WAA10979@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.2.1 done 
In-reply-to: marcs's message of Sat, 05 Jul 1997 20:45:04 -0600.
         <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970705203134.9736P-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 1997 22:05:57 -0500
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

> 1.2.1 is rolled and available at http://www.apache.org/dist/
> 
> I haven't yet made a diff.  I probably will a bit later.
> 
> I haven't yet updated the other files on the site to reflect the changes.
> Are we pushing this as replacing 1.2.0 (in which case I will say "use it"
> and move 1.2.0 to old) or as supplementing it (in which case I will say
> "1.2.0 is cool, but this could be cooler" and perhaps leave 1.2.0 there)?
> 
> Comments?

I would vote to move 1.2.0 out of there. We have pretty high 
confidence that this is a better release than 1.2.0.