From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <199707032111.RAA19313@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: New configure
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 17:10:59 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970703132322.0086c4b0@localhost> from "Brian
 Behlendorf" at Jul 3, 97 01:23:22 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> 
> 
> After personally debating whether it's appropriate for 1.3 or should wait
> until 2.0 (in the interests of getting 1.3 out the door), I have succumbed
> to the thought that it's cool for 1.3.  It looks like a major change, but
> functionally it changes very little, and portability issues related to this
> change should be negligible.  Therefore, +1.  Though more will need to be
> done, i.e. moving nt/ to os/nt (which should contain the EMX stuff too).
> And yes, all variants of Unix are under /os/unix.  
> 

Well, I like the idea, but I'd prefer it wait for 2.0. It might
make sense to keep Configuration common for 1.2.x and 1.3 and
do a nicer rework with 2.0, when Configure will really need to
be more intelligent :/

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"