httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] PR#344: 64-bit cleanup
Date Sat, 12 Jul 1997 07:07:04 GMT
You can agree with this all you want... but the fact remains that cmd_info
is used both as an integer and a pointer.  And XtOffsetOf is widely used. 
I suppose we could go:

int foo = XtOffsetOf(blah,blah); 

and just use &foo in the table, but just imagine how much fun it is to
maintain this crap.

Or is everyone agreeing to my statement that we could have both
cmd_info_ptr and cmd_info_int ?  What are you agreeing with?

Dean

On Wed, 9 Jul 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> +1 ditto
> 
> sameer wrote:
> > 
> > +1 here too
> > 
> > > At 11:20 AM 7/9/97 +0100, you wrote:
> > > >I think that having a
> > > >single value to hold both int and pointer values is generally an evilness,
> > > >so I would prefer to _define_ the cmd_info field of the directive
> > > >definitions as a pointer in the API, and not define it as a generic data
> > > >type. Is there any module which is actually using it to store int values?

> > > 
> > > I strongly agree with this.
> > > 
> > > 	Brian
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> > > "Why not?" - TL           brian@organic.com - hyperreal.org - apache.org
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-986-8770
> > President					FAX:     510-986-8777
> > C2Net
> > http://www.c2.net/				sameer@c2.net
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"
> 


Mime
View raw message