httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] add CoreDumpDirectory
Date Wed, 02 Jul 1997 17:42:58 GMT
On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:
> One question: which is less likely to get trashed, memory allocated from a
> pool or something allocated statically?  Right now the memory for
> directory name is allocated from a pool. 

It's all pretty likely to get trashed.  But allocating from a pool is probably
the worst of the lot though, because it won't help core dumps occuring due to
our memory allocator.  I'd be happy with a static char coredump_dir [MAX_PATH];
Otherwise, +1.


View raw message