httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From c...@decus.org (Rodent of Unusual Size)
Subject Re: Clarification for the "voting" description
Date Wed, 16 Jul 1997 16:19:16 GMT
>From the fingers of Jim Jagielski flowed the following:
>
>Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>> 
>>      1) No voting; freewheeling commit of changes, rollback if problems
>>         are encountered.
>
>I think this is agreed to at some point. For example, when the NT stuff
>was being committed and worked on, it was semi informally agreed that
>the commits be done first.

    I wasn't asking what activities should be carried out under which
    rules, but whether these descriptions accurately describe the rules
    we use.

    Do they seem to cover the different voting rules to you?

    #ken    :-)}

Mime
View raw message