httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Too much going into 1.2 tree?
Date Sun, 13 Jul 1997 18:38:10 GMT
Randy Terbush wrote:
> 
> > >From the fingers of Jim Jagielski flowed the following:
> > >
> > >Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>     Erm, can anyone explain why the NT stuff is getting put into the 1.2
> > >>     tree?
> > >> 
> > >> % cvs update apache-1.2
> > >
> > >I always make sure to use the -rAPACHE_1_2_X option. I haven't
> > >seen the below at all.
> > 
> >     Grrrr..  That was it.  I checked this tree out with the tag, and
> >     I've been omitting it ever since.  This tree is completely unrelated
> >     to the HEAD tree I have.
> > 
> >     {Sigh} `Never mind..'  I still don't like this branching business..
> 
> If this is true, then for the first time since we setup CVS, the 
> tags are apparently now meaningless when doing updates. Marc warned 
> us... :-)
> 

Yeah... The tag is supposed to be sticky, but seldom is.

A hint:	alias cvs-1.2 'cvs -rAPACHE_1_2_X' and then do

	cvs-1.2 -Pd apache-1.2 (or whatever)

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

Mime
View raw message