httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: New configure
Date Thu, 03 Jul 1997 21:10:59 GMT
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> After personally debating whether it's appropriate for 1.3 or should wait
> until 2.0 (in the interests of getting 1.3 out the door), I have succumbed
> to the thought that it's cool for 1.3.  It looks like a major change, but
> functionally it changes very little, and portability issues related to this
> change should be negligible.  Therefore, +1.  Though more will need to be
> done, i.e. moving nt/ to os/nt (which should contain the EMX stuff too).
> And yes, all variants of Unix are under /os/unix.  

Well, I like the idea, but I'd prefer it wait for 2.0. It might
make sense to keep Configuration common for 1.2.x and 1.3 and
do a nicer rework with 2.0, when Configure will really need to
be more intelligent :/

      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services           |
            "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"

View raw message