Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA12965;
	Tue, 17 Jun 1997 00:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gate-isdn.ukweb.com (gate-isdn.ukweb.com [194.152.65.149])
	by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA12961
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 00:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aardvark.ukweb.com [192.168.2.4]
	by gate-isdn.ukweb.com with smtp (Exim 1.61 #1)
	id 0wdsxi-00087t-00; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:45:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:43:27 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark J Cox <mark@ukweb.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: NT and modules
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.HPP.3.95.970616185615.11784A-100000@ace.nueva.pvt.k12.ca.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970617083520.20681C-100000@aardvark.ukweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Alexei said:
> question: does it work with Windows 95 as well, or just NT? Win 95
> would be a definite plus.

It works fine with Windows 95 (at least the 1.2b10 version did).  Although
it needed a slight patch in order to understand forward slashes sometimes
(I think Paul posted the patch on this list a while ago). 

Does anyone have a list of what changes between Ambarish's 1.2 port that
was on his site and the one that was commited?  I know that it replaced
Paul's readdir() replacements and removed the crypt() routine but was
anything else changed? 

Mark