Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA27486;
	Fri, 13 Jun 1997 04:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gate-isdn.ukweb.com (gate-isdn.ukweb.com [194.152.65.149])
	by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA27482
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 04:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aardvark.ukweb.com [192.168.2.4]
	by gate-isdn.ukweb.com with smtp (Exim 1.61 #1)
	id 0wcUDv-0001NV-00; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:08:55 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:06:42 +0100 (BST)
From: Mark J Cox <mark@ukweb.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: AAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970613065022.28101A-100000@bcc.louisville.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970613120456.10799e-100000@aardvark.ukweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

> Yeah, they're SOOOOOO good at PC Week that they figure they don't NEED
> feedback...  Their frigging email DOES NOT WORK!

Does anyone else think it is a good idea to put a copy of this letter on
www.apache.org?

We've got an Apache-in-the-News page which points to the PC Week article
so it would be the perfect place to add a "here is the Apache Groups
response to this article" link.

Mark