Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA05810; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eat.organic.com (h10.n145.organic.com [204.152.145.10]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA05804 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (brian@localhost) by eat.organic.com (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA26431 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:56:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Behlendorf To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Xssi used by others In-Reply-To: <199706060232.UAA07236@pooh.pageplus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Howard Fear wrote: > FWIW, I think things like the xSSI extensions should be as public > as possible. It makes life much easier for web page developers - > not to mention HTML-how to authors. I can't speak for anyone else > who's worked on mod_include, but I wouldn't object if Netscape and/or > Microsoft implemented the same commands in their servers. Still > won't make them as good as Apache ;-) We *really* need a standard HTML template mechanism. Every server application tool out there, from FireFly to iCat to IIS, has done their own, and it's sheer headaches for content developers. Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com www.apache.org hyperreal.com http://www.organic.com/JOBS