Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 17:29:37 -0600 (MDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@worldgate.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: bugdb.cgi suggestion
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95dg3.970628161848.32660I-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970628172831.12666C-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

I'm not sure that will help.  We already tell people to do that, but they
will ignore us anyway.  We will just end up bloating the database...

I would be happy if you want to add more warnings about being hunted down
and ripped apart by wild dogs if you submit a stupid PR to the existing
warning.

On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote:

> A button on the "edit pr" page which closes the pr giving this reason (or
> something like it): 
> 
>     You are receiving this form letter response because your bug report
>     appears to be a configuration problem, or configuration question.
>     We ask that you check in the comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
>     USENET newsgroup first.  If you don't receive a response within a
>     few days, then please submit a new bug report and indicate that you
>     have asked elsewhere.  If it's a known issue, you'll probably get a
>     faster response from the newsgroup and you will help keep developer
>     time free for improving Apache.  Most bug reports submitted are
>     actually user configuration problems that could be easily fixed by
>     asking in the newsgroup.
> 
>     We apologize in advance if your bug report is actually a bug.
> 
> Dean
>