Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA29804; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 16:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devsys.jaguNET.com (devsys.jaguNET.com [206.156.208.6]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA29763 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 16:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id TAA15337 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:55:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199706152355.TAA15337@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Whither 1.2.1? To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:55:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Brian Behlendorf" at Jun 15, 97 04:25:24 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Alexei Kosut wrote: > > I'm not convinced a 1.2.1 is necessary, since there certainly aren't > > any show-stoppers out there. What I'm wondering is how long people > > think it'll be until 1.3b1 is released? If it's too long, I think a > > 1.2.1 with the various bugfixes/etc... might be in order. If it's only > > a month or so, it can wait. Still, I'd like to get a new Apache out > > there in that sort of timeframe. > > In my crack-addled dreams, we'd have a 1.3b1 on July 15th or so, so > about a month. I think much of the substantial stuff we had on the > plate for 1.2 could make it in here. > I think that it very, very doable, esp considering how cleanly the NT stuff was folded in. Kudos to Ben and Ambarish !!! -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"