httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: Our recent Apache woes (fwd)
Date Fri, 27 Jun 1997 22:33:09 GMT
What problems are you experiencing leading you to need serialized accept? 
We haven't touched that piece of code yet in 1.2.1 ... in 1.3 I hit it a
bit by ditching the support for listeners == NULL. 

Dean

On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > 
> > I am 100% convinced that serialized accepts are the way to go.  I'm still
> > convincing myself that weakly serialized (i.e. a maximum of N tasks inside
> > the loop) is a good thing as well (consider SMP boxes). 
> > 
> > The problem described below regarding the load is probably still explained
> > by the lack of serialization.  The difference is probably that hpux uses a
> > different formula for calculating its load avg than sunos 4.1.x.  I'm not
> > sure how to relate the rest of the problem though. 
> > 
> > We could start defining one of the serialization directives in 1.2.1
> > according to the reports we've received for:  osf, hpux, sunos.  Use
> > whatever the users have reported works for them.  (Or whoever uses those
> > architectures could tell me which of fcntl or flock works for you.) 
> 
> This is weird... I'm finding out that with 1.2.1 :) and 1.3 that
> FreeBSD and A/UX _also_ work better using serialized accepts...
> I'm sure no one else runs A/UX, but I know we have a few FreeBSDers
> here: Have you seen the same?
> 
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"
> 


Mime
View raw message