httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] rollback of unwarranted change (was: [PATCH] unwarranted
Date Thu, 29 May 1997 12:20:30 GMT
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > 
> >     Let me rename the message so it's a little more clear that this
> >     patch is rolling back an unwarranted change, not supplying one. :->
> > 
> >     A retroactive -1 on the patch, and on a 1.2 tarball, until this is
> >     corrected - then +1. :-)
> > 
> 
> I'd like to know specifically what this effects. The patch fixes
> a showstopper. To veto the patch you need a real good reason
> and saying that it affects "one of your modules" without more
> detail just isn't enough... Is it an official Apache module?
> How does it affect it? Can your module work around it? 

FInally, does the patch _you_ provide "fix" what you are talking
about? It looks like it does, but you don't say specifically.
If it does, instead of saying "-1 on the patch" you should have
requested that your patch be included before the tarball, if you get
my drift... A -1 carries a lot of weight.

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message