Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id TAA15223; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@valis.worldgate.com [198.161.84.2])
          by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id TAA15215 for <new-httpd@apache.org>;
 Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost)
	by valis.worldgate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA10303
	for <new-httpd@apache.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 20:16:57 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 20:16:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@worldgate.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: Netscape 2.01 vs Apache 1.2b7 (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95dg3.970422190843.10226G-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970422201304.10061A-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote:

> I'm strongly considering writing a tuning doc, and a how not to benchmark
> doc.  I'll add to one if someone else starts it first.

Sounds good to me.  Then we can add some benchmarks showing the oldest
NCSA we can find running from inetd beating everything else around.
Hey, I can make a perfectly repeatable test that shows that.  <g>

I've been meaning to do the same thing... will have a bit more free time
starting thursday assuming I don't drown, but it is a bit down on my
priority list.  If I feel like writing silly docs suEXEC may come first...