Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA01295; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@valis.worldgate.com [198.161.84.2]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA01289 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by valis.worldgate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA27932 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 19:53:20 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 19:53:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Marc Slemko To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: multithreaded DNS resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote: > I'm pretty sure I've seen talk of this on bind-workers. You could also > look at glibc v2 (which is linux libc v6) since it is supposed to be the > first "re-entrant" version of the library. Solaris has re-entrant > resolving functions already... yeah we're gonna need a portable _r > library to do 2.0 with real threads. AFAIK, a lot of reentrant implementations are still unusable for a threaded application that makes heavy use of DNS resolution because they still block far too much and that will really kill your web server... > > Dean > > On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Nathan Schrenk wrote: > > > > > I have found myself needing a MT-safe DNS resolver library for a project > > I'm working on, and began looking around the Internet for such a piece of > > code. I haven't found anything yet, and thought I'd ask here to see if > > anyone knows where I can find something like this. If I can't find a > > thread safe DNS resolver that will work for me (and has a suitable > > license,) I'm going to have to write one. > > > > If no one knows where I can find such code, and I end up writing something > > that does this, I'd like to contribute the code for use in Apache 2.0 > > since I believe something like this will be needed for simultaneous > > hostname resolution in different threads. Are there any fixed plans for > > Apache 2.0 development? Is there a set group of people that are going to > > be architecting 2.0? > > > > Nathan > > > > -- > > Nathan Schrenk nschrenk@neog.com > > Neoglyphics Media Corp. http://www.neog.com/ > > > > >