Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA17609; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DECUS.Org (Topaz.DECUS.Org [192.67.173.1]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id CAA17604 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 02:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Lucy.DECUS.Org by DECUS.Org (PMDF V4.2-13 #18511) id <01IHEVV2WQTC8WX6QF@DECUS.Org>; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 05:46:51 EST Received: from Master.DECUS.Org by Lucy.DECUS.Org; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/16Sep96-0258PM) id AA09016; Mon, 7 Apr 1997 05:50:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 1997 05:36:44 -0400 From: coar@decus.org (Rodent of Unusual Size) Subject: Re: unsigned host port To: New-HTTPd@hyperreal.com, Coar@decus.org Message-id: <97040705364489@decus.org> X-VMS-To: NH X-VMS-Cc: COAR Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org >From the fingers of Marc Slemko flowed the following: > >---------------------------- >revision 1.93 >date: 1997/03/29 03:40:34; author: fielding; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 >Host port changed to unsigned short. > >Submitted by: Ken Coar, PR #276 >Reviewed by: Roy Fielding, Chuck Murcko >---------------------------- > >This change didn't seem to make it to the mailing list. > >The reason I bring it up is because mod_rewrite hasn't yet been updated: I'm not sure what you mean. I received a copy of the update notice from apache-cvs. The patch that went in didn't include mod_rewrite by design, although that may have been a design error. ;-> When I submitted the patch I *didn't* include the required change to mod_rewrite, but flagged it for Ralf's attention. He acknowledged it, but I don't know if he made the change in his own copy and didn't submit a patch to the group, or hasn't made it at all, or what. As I recall, the major feeling was that, if mod_rewrite was to be considered a regular part of the Apache package, the copy the repository had to be considered the master, and Ralf's a copy thereof, rather than the converse. However, that never seemed to happen. Or perhaps I'm misremembering. The question was complicated by the fact that the latest mod_rewrite is always backward-compatible. I can't explain why, but when I've had something that needed application to mod_rewrite, I *haven't* been including it myself but just flagging it for Ralf's attention, and he's typically applied it in a subsequent patch submitted for the module. {Sigh} Mea culpa. I'll be better.. So: what *is* the story with where the master mod_rewrite lives? #ken :-/}