Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA14132; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklodge.c2.net (blacklodge.c2.net [208.139.36.35]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA14122 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabber.c2.net (gabber.c2.net [208.139.36.80]) by blacklodge.c2.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA20473 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sameer@localhost) by gabber.c2.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA07973 for new-httpd@apache.org; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:14:19 -0700 (PDT) From: sameer Message-Id: <199704220014.RAA07973@gabber.c2.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache/htdocs/manual/misc FAQ.html To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:14:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: from Marc Slemko at "Apr 21, 97 05:47:25 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org And here I was thinking that the 'ConneXion' in 'Community ConneXion' was an incorrect speling. Thanks. =) > On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, sameer wrote: > > > > coar 97/04/21 15:43:25 > > > > > > Modified: htdocs/manual/misc FAQ.html > > > Log: > > > Update comments and add nph-script Q&A. (BTW, "connexion" is *not* > > > a typo!) > > > > ok, I'm confused. What's 'connexion' then? > > British (and mildly historical) spelling of connection. You want > the full history? How about... "after you have connexed to the > server, it will drop the connextion if it doesn't like you being > connexed." I think that's correct, but I'm no expert... > > Courtesy of the OED: > > connexion, connection (k&schwa.'nekS&schwa.n). [ad. L. connexion-em (in cl. L. > conexion-) binding together, close union, n. of action f. co(n)nect-ere (ppl. > stem co(n)nex-) to CONNECT: cf. Fr. connexion (14th c. Oresme), Pr. connexio, > Sp. conexion, Pg. connexao, Ital. connessione. The etymological spelling > connexion is the original in Eng.; in 17th c. it was supported by the verb > CONNEX; after the latter was displaced by CONNECT, the sb. began c 1725-50 to > be often spelt connection, a spelling which, under the influence of > etymologically-formed words, such as affection, collection, direction, > inspection (all f. L. ppl. stems in -ect-), is now very frequent. > The earlier Eng. lexicographers, including Bailey, Johnson, Walker, Todd, > Crabb, recognize connexion only. Connection appears in Webster (1828) who says > `For the sake of regular analogy, I have inserted Connection as the derivative > of the English connect, and would discard connexion'. This preference has > been followed by other dictionaries in U.S. Latham would differentiate the > two spellings and use connexion only in senses 5-8. Connexion is the official > and invariable spelling in sense 8, and was used in all senses by the majority > of writers (or printers) in England until the mid-20th c., when connection > became more ususal.] > > -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 President FAX: 510-986-8777 C2Net http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net