Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA12935; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devsys.jaguNET.com (devsys.jaguNET.com [206.156.208.6]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA12928 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id RAA21547 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 17:56:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199704192156.RAA21547@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: systems without accept_mutex, bug? To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 17:56:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9704192107.aa14782@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> from "Ben Laurie" at Apr 19, 97 09:07:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ben Laurie wrote: > > > Could be. And, on SysV, there's also semaphores to consider. > Good point... didn't even think about that. -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"