Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA10736; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 14:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devsys.jaguNET.com (devsys.jaguNET.com [206.156.208.6]) by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA10728 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 14:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id RAA25139 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 17:31:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199704062131.RAA25139@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: FYI - coredumps on FreeBSD To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 17:31:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Rob Hartill" at Apr 6, 97 09:32:41 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Rob Hartill wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Apr 1997, Randy Terbush wrote: > > > Chuck, Dirk and I had reported that we were seeing some odd SEGV > > problems that seemed to be associated with a call to > > lingering_close. I seem to have tracked down the problem as being > > caused by the server being linked with libraries that had not been > > compiled with FD_SETSIZE=1024 as my kernels and the rest of the > > servers have. > > What does that mean to your average FreeBSD user (like me) ? > > Building a new kernel sounds extreme. > Well, to do it right, when you bump up FD_SETSIZE you should also recreate everything ! With web-specific servers, this is most likely a Good Idea anyway, since you want to tune ths system as much as possible anyway. Of course, you may not even _need_ that many fd's so... -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"