httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roy T. Fielding" <field...@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Subject Re: oddity w/SIGHUP (related to PR#429)
Date Mon, 21 Apr 1997 20:36:57 GMT
>That is weird.  Can you give it a try with my graceful patch installed?
>Or just take the little hunk that adds SIGALRM to the block-mask of the
>hup handler?  (It's in set_signals).
>
>I'm going to change the graceful patch so that:
>
>- restart and graceful_restart disable SIGHUP and SIGUSR1 immediately
>- set_signals blocks SIGHUP, SIGUSR1, and SIGALRM inside the hup and usr1
>  handlers

I looked at this stuff over the weekend and I am convinced that the
sigaction calls should have their masks set up as you describe above.
I also think this is a safe change and should be made now, rather than
after 1.2b9.

....Roy

Mime
View raw message