httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: "release candidate"
Date Fri, 02 May 1997 00:28:30 GMT
Dean Gaudet wrote:
> I've had a request from a user that we stop calling the betas "release
> candidates", since we've been doing that since 1.2b4 and well... um.  You
> know the story. 
> Suppose that 1.2b11 becomes 1.2.  What is our next step?  The list of
> submitted features that are good is pretty big, and we've got a bunch of
> ports (at least 5 PRs with simple changes for new platforms) waiting.  Do
> we just commit 'em all and call it 1.2.1? 
> But that doesn't seem like a subrelease to me.  It sounds more like 1.3. 

I don't know... Simply adding ports without any real functional
updates seems like a perfect sub-release to me :)

      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services           |
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

View raw message