httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: oddity w/SIGHUP (related to PR#429)
Date Mon, 21 Apr 1997 22:03:52 GMT
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> 
> >That is weird.  Can you give it a try with my graceful patch installed?
> >Or just take the little hunk that adds SIGALRM to the block-mask of the
> >hup handler?  (It's in set_signals).
> >
> >I'm going to change the graceful patch so that:
> >
> >- restart and graceful_restart disable SIGHUP and SIGUSR1 immediately
> >- set_signals blocks SIGHUP, SIGUSR1, and SIGALRM inside the hup and usr1
> >  handlers
> 
> I looked at this stuff over the weekend and I am convinced that the
> sigaction calls should have their masks set up as you describe above.
> I also think this is a safe change and should be made now, rather than
> after 1.2b9.
> 

+1 as well...

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message