httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dirk.vanGulik" <Dirk.vanGu...@jrc.it>
Subject Re: [UPDATE] mod_template demonstration
Date Mon, 10 Mar 1997 13:25:26 GMT

+1;

Nice thing that example; might do with some set_string_slot()/
set_flag_slot() for doing command stuff.

There is a small buglett in the Makefile; mod_auth_id.o. instead
of mod_template.

Dw.

> Subject: Re: [UPDATE] mod_template demonstration
> 
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > 
> > >From the fingers of Chuck Murcko flowed the following:
> > >
> > >Looks OK if the template module is already in the distribution. +1 if
> > >you also add a mod_template.html for the docs. This can just be the
> > >README, HTMLized, IMO.
> > 
> >     No, mod_template.c is a new creation and not in the distribution, so
> >     I suppose it qualifies as a feature rather than a bugfix.  It
> >     doesn't change any existing code.  I'd *like* to get it into
> >     1.2final, but if the featureness prevents that it'all right with me.
> >     There were a couple of +1s that I thought were for adding it to
> >     the distribution, but there was some ambiguity there.
> > 
> >     I'll whip up a mod_template.html and a patch to link it into the API
> >     pages - if it gets voted into the 1.2 distribution.  If the
> >     concensus is that it should go into contrib, we can just skip the
> >     patch and leave the .html file in the same directory as the module
> >     itself.
> > 
> OK. I don't think it's really a feature; it seems more like docs. Just
> in case it doesn't make it into the distribution, it would be nice if
> you gave the user instructions on where to put it. But don't need to do
> that if it's already in the modules subdir.
> 
> +1 for including this as "live" docs, though.
> -- 
> chuck
> Chuck Murcko
> The Topsail Group, West Chester PA USA
> chuck@topsail.org
> 


Mime
View raw message