httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [STATUS]
Date Tue, 25 Mar 1997 13:21:00 GMT
Chuck Murcko wrote:
> 
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 
> > Dean Gaudet wrote:
> > >
> > > 1.2b8 status as of Mon Mar 24 11:26:04 PST 1997
> > >
> > >
> > > No patches yet:
> > >
> > >   * -DNO_LINGCLOSE default for those operating systems that require it.
> > >     Chuck says UnixWare and Next.  Jim adds SunOS 4.  Dean says IRIX
> > >     needs it too until/unless SGI provides a patch.
> > >
> > 
> > Not to reopen an ugly can-of-worms, but there was some discussion
> > on making the NO_LINGCLOSE stuff the default and enabling it only
> > for those can handle it.
> > 
> > Also, does the current lingering_close() code reduce/remove the FIN_WAIT_2
> > problem?
> > --
> It does for these systems. I've had reports from users of all these that
> the problem is greatly reduced.
> 

I'm confused... The NO_LINGCLOSE wrapper completely bypasses the
lingering_close() code. Do you mean that the current l_c() also
reduces the # of FIN_WAIT_2 states but that things are best if
bypassed...?


-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message