Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id VAA29647; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bilge-gw.topsail.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP id VAA29639; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from argo.topsail.org ([172.16.86.5]) by bilge-gw.topsail.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA20970 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:54:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33167320.2781E494@topsail.org> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:54:40 -0500 From: Chuck Murcko Organization: The Topsail Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: ApacheNT References: <199702272028.PAA09675@shado.jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > > > > > I support this - however more than one individual has approached me (through > > apache@apache.org or personally) and said they were either working on or have > > completed a port of Apache (1.1 and 1.2) to NT, and were wondering about > > official support in one form or another. While it's bound to compare > > unfavorably in speed terms with IIS or another server based with NT concepts > > from the beginning, I think this is a worthwhile endeavor, and I'd like to > > propose a way to support it. > > > > So, for the short term: I'm proposing starting an apache-ntdev mailing list, > > and sending mail to the numerous folks who contacted us in reference to NT > > ports about joining. Publication of the existance of the list would still be > > word-of-mouth as this list is, mostly. > > > > +1 > +1 -- chuck Chuck Murcko The Topsail Group, West Chester PA USA chuck@topsail.org