Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id IAA12181;
 Sat, 1 Feb 1997 08:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP
 id IAA12175; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 08:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sierra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com
 (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA07663 for <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>;
 Sat, 1 Feb 1997 10:29:34 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199702011629.KAA07663@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: FIN_WAIT_2 
In-reply-to: jim's message of Sat, 01 Feb 1997 09:40:16 -0500.
         <199702011440.JAA01151@shado.jaguNET.com>
X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 10:29:34 -0600
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com


FTR - I'm not convinced we have found the solution here either.
My sky has been falling in some other areas and I have not had
much time to offer constructive data or suggestions. One fact
remains that we are calling shutdown on closed sockets. Dunno
if this is a symptom or just a fact of life.


> Ok, ok.... I'll be quiet...
> 
> It's kinda obvious that no one else seems as concerned about those
> OSs without FIN_WAIT_2 timeouts. I seem to be bugging people too
> much as well...
> 
> I'll be a good boy now :)
> 
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>                   "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"