httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chuck Murcko <ch...@topsail.org>
Subject Re: lingering_close performance idea
Date Mon, 10 Feb 1997 04:51:55 GMT
Weird. I thought Linux *didn't* need the mutex on accept().

Dean Gaudet wrote:
> 
> It's needed for:
> 
> SOLARIS2 IRIX LINUX SCO5 AUX SVR4 DGUX UXPDS __MACHTEN__ ISC
> 
> Granted some of those aren't major, but solaris, irix, and linux are.
> Noticeably absent are BSD 4.3- and 4.4-based systems.
> 
> Dean
> 
> On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Rob Hartill wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 9 Feb 1997, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, why the heck is the accept mutex needed for every single major OS,
> >
> > it isn't is it ?
> >
> > did you misread conf.h or did we screw up ?
> >
> >

-- 
chuck
Chuck Murcko
The Topsail Group, West Chester PA USA
chuck@topsail.org

Mime
View raw message