httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: Apache 1.2b7-dev performance
Date Fri, 07 Feb 1997 20:28:27 GMT
Ed Korthof wrote:
> I realize there are potential problems with NO_LINGCLOSE, but with appropriate
> timeouts & good observation, it will legitamitely improve performance for high
> load sites.  So I think we should suggest it as one possible performance
> improvement, with a warning about potential problems with FIN_WAIT_2 (and other
> issues?).

I think this goes back to Ben's point that lingering_close() only be
enabled for those systems that we know can handle it. We should mention
that l_c() should be enabled iff one's OS supports a FIN_WAIT_2
timeout as well
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services           |
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

View raw message