Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id UAA03863;
 Mon, 6 Jan 1997 20:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with SMTP
 id UAA03842; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 20:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 24670 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 1997 04:03:59 -0000
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 20:03:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Dean Gaudet <dgaudet@arctic.org>
To: Apache Group <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>
Subject: Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "request_time in nested include" on BSDI
 (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970107033343.17872B-100000@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95dg1.970106200350.15624n-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

And which I supplied a patch for already...

Dean

On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Rob Hartill wrote:

> 
> Looks like the answer to the easlier bug report about nested SSI
> outputing the wrong date.
> 
> Acked.
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon Jan 6 18:56:47 1997
> From: onishi@nova.co.jp
> To: apache-bugs%apache.org@organic.com
> Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "request_time in nested include" on BSDI
> 
> Submitter: onishi@nova.co.jp
> Operating system: BSDI, version: 2.1
> Version of Apache Used: 1.2b3 & 1.2b4
> Extra Modules used: 
> URL exhibiting problem: 
> 
> Symptoms:
> --
> `request_time' value is not copied in subreq(ex. nested include in SSI).
> 
> I tempolarily hacked `make_sub_request()' to copy `request_time' value.
> 
> --
> 
> Backtrace:
> --
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>