Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id TAA11020; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:39:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from bilge-gw.topsail.org by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP id TAA11011; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from argo.topsail.org ([172.16.86.5]) by bilge-gw.topsail.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA08555 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:39:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <32EC235E.794BDF32@topsail.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:39:10 -0500 From: Chuck Murcko Organization: The Topsail Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] update docs with fin_wait_2 webpage References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jan 1997, Marc Slemko wrote: > > I want to add the included file to the repository and modify things as in > > the patch below to refer to it. Comments? > > Looks grand to me. +1 > Good here. +1 > > Is the voting policy the same with docs changes as with source? > > When it's fixing typos/think-o's or broken HTML, people have generally gone > ahead and done it. When it's adding significant text or rearranging content > opinions were sought, but I don't think any formal voting process has > developed. I'm comfortable with this arrangement. > Sheesh. I spend 1.5 days with my boy and we're up two betas. I'm going to start final push for 1.2's proxy ASAP. -- chuck Chuck Murcko The Topsail Group, West Chester PA USA chuck@topsail.org