Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id XAA22311; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:42:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from futurefx.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP id XAA22302; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:42:28 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by futurefx.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) id BAA24297 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 01:42:22 -0600 From: "Jason S. Clary" Message-Id: <199701260742.BAA24297@futurefx.com> Subject: Project Library update To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 01:42:17 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: from "Marc Slemko" at Jan 25, 97 10:08:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP3 *ALPHA*] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Shouldn't the project library include RFC 1945, 2068 and 2069.. possibly others.. It seems silly to provide the MIME rfc and not the RFC's on http/1.0, http/1.1 and digest authentication... btw, where can I find the spec on CGI and FastCGI? I don't see anything about them in the RFC's... If they exist, they should also be there on the project library page. You might also consider putting up the HTML 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 spec.. It may not be directly related to an HTTP server but people poking about apache.org might be interested in it. I personaly mirror the RFC and STD archives from ftp.internic.net, but it seems most people don't know where to get them from. At the very least, you should include a link to w3.org for more info on http & html specs... they even have the specs for PICS and other extensions on their site. Cheers Jason Clary