Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id SAA02197; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 18:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from shado.jaguNET.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP id SAA02138; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 18:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jim@localhost) by shado.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id VAA04315 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 21:15:12 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199701260215.VAA04315@shado.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: HAVE_SNPRINTF To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 21:15:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Dean Gaudet" at Jan 25, 97 05:48:41 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Dean Gaudet wrote: > > I forget if we were supposed to be adding HAVE_SNPRINTF to conf.h for > those systems that have it... or if we're just going to default to > apache's everywhere. > At last count, not many had it. Sun5.6 does and FreeBSD and maybe BSDI as well. Defaulting to ap_snprintf() should be safe, but if there are known good local implementations, lets start a list of 'em, but not add them just yet :) -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"