Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id NAA14735; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from shado.jaguNET.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) with ESMTP id NAA14726; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jim@localhost) by shado.jaguNET.com (8.8.5/jag-2.4) id QAA07874 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 16:00:30 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199701242100.QAA07874@shado.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Votes please To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 16:00:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199701241915.NAA24892@sierra.zyzzyva.com> from "Randy Terbush" at Jan 24, 97 01:15:40 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Randy Terbush wrote: > > > This is one that would be nice to get in this beta. > > My comments below do not mean that this does not work, it just > doesn't work for the group_list which is not compiled in by > default if I remember correctly. Tough to check that if we are > sending to the wrapper for a different target? > > ------- Forwarded Message > > Someone reported this bug the other day. The solution below > does not solve the issue when MULTIPLE_GROUPS is defined and > we are checking an suexec target. +1 -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"