Message-Id: <199701192336.RAA21947@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
Subject: Re: snprintf changes 
In-reply-to: robh's message of Sun, 19 Jan 1997 23:17:15 +0000.
         <Pine.BSF.3.91.970119231144.13811B-100000@ponty.imdb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 17:36:13 -0600
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

> On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Randy Terbush wrote:
> 
> > Since Marc's patch is rather large and touches much of the code,
> > I would vote to commit it now.
> 
> So far so good here. If it's going in, the sooner the better.
> 
> +1

That is three votes to include I believe. Marc, do you have a current
patch? Might be much easier if we can also agree to remove mod_fastcgi.c
from the distribution.


> > It does not appear to break anything
> > and would probably allow more people to test portability issues if it
> > is committed. I'm going to hold off on commiting any other patches
> > until we get this in since my commit of the current mod_fastcgi.c
> > has already caused problems for this patch.
> 
> mod_fastcgi. Urgh. If this is being maintained outside of the group
> then it doesn't belong in the src/ dir. If there's someone who reads this
> list maintaining it, then fine, otherwise +1 on moving it to contrib.

I agree. I understand that it was included for NCSA compatibility,
but I don't understand why it can't be added just like other modules
like mod_php, mod_perl, etc. Not to mention that it is not being
distributed under Apache Copyright.

I would vote to remove it from the distribution.