Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id OAA06860; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 14:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from shado.jaguNET.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP id OAA06856; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 14:17:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jim@localhost) by shado.jaguNET.com (8.8.4/jag-2.4) id RAA07079 for new-httpd@hyperreal.com; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 17:17:39 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199701122217.RAA07079@shado.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: PLEASE try compiling snprintf.c (was: Re: snprintf.c uploaded) To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 17:17:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Marc Slemko" at Jan 12, 97 03:15:16 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Marc Slemko wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jan 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Marc Slemko wrote: > > > > > > Sigh. My thinking right now is that is that since the *cvt routines from > > > the libs with xinetd are reasonably short and look to be portable, we may > > > as well rename them and use them everywhere. > > > > I didn't see the cvt family there :/ > > You mean in xinetd? libs/src/misc/[g]cvt.c > Ack... I was looking in sio and str -- ==================================================================== Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services jim@jaguNET.com | http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"