Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id MAA29818; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from gabber.c2.net by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP id MAA29812; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sameer@localhost) by gabber.c2.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) id MAA03975; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:41:56 -0800 (PST) From: sameer Message-Id: <199701092041.MAA03975@gabber.c2.net> Subject: Re: nph- deprecation To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:41:56 -0800 (PST) Cc: new-httpd@hyperreal.com In-Reply-To: <9701091823.aa13029@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk> from Ben Laurie at "Jan 9, 97 06:23:41 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com > > Eh? I thought we agreed ages ago to make it standard? This is the patch which > allows buffering to be controlled via headers, right? actually, no. I thought to control buffering with headers but I found a better (IMO) solution. I'm doing a select loop around the CGI output. Then if the CGI author wants to buffer, all the buffering can happen in the CGI, and Apache deals with that directly. -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 President FAX: 510-986-8777 C2Net C2Net is having a party: http://www.c2.net/party/ http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net