Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id KAA16243; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 10:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with ESMTP id KAA16230; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 10:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from sierra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id MAA08241 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 12:28:11 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199701021828.MAA08241@sierra.zyzzyva.com> To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache/src In-reply-to: p.richards's message of 02 Jan 1997 15:09:14 +0000. <57hgl015d1.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk> X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 12:28:11 -0600 From: Randy Terbush Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com When this last came up, there was enough question about "what it takes" that it seemed prudent to just change the dates on anything we distribute that is under Apache copyright. I certainly don't see what it could hurt. > I remember someone quoting some legal stuff about this but I forget > the details. Why is every copyright date being updated? My past > experience has been to change the copyright if the content is changed > but not to otherwise. > > -- > Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) > Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. > Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk > Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155