httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: PLEASE try compiling snprintf.c (was: Re: snprintf.c uploaded)
Date Sun, 12 Jan 1997 22:08:16 GMT
Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 12 Jan 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > Marc Slemko wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 12 Jan 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Marc Slemko wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Try linking something and you will notice that you need cvt, gcvt,
etc.
> > > > > I think cvt.c and gvct.c are all that I needed to add to make it
work.
> > > > > >From my tests, I think there are a few bugs to hunt down in the
code
> > > > > too...
> > > > 
> > > > Hmmm... on the systems I've tried, *cvt()s are already available :/
> > > 
> > > Oh.  Which ones?
> > > 
> > > Solaris, AIX, SunOS and IRIX do.  FreeBSD and BSD/OS don't.
> > 
> > Don't FreeBSD and BSD/OS have snprintf()? If so, then they don't
> > need our version.
> 
> Yes, it isn't a problem for FreeBSD and BSD/OS but I think it _will_ be a
> portability problem on other platforms. 
> 
> Sigh.  My thinking right now is that is that since the *cgt routines from
> the libs with xinetd are reasonably short and look to be portable, we may
> as well rename them and use them everywhere.

I didn't see the cvt family there :/

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message