httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: snprintf()
Date Tue, 07 Jan 1997 11:21:58 GMT
Chuck Murcko wrote:
> 
> Marc Slemko liltingly intones:
> > 
> 
> > Note that I think any implementation, especially if it is done
> > before 1.2, needs to have a quick define that can be easily done
> > to make it just a wrapper around sprintf in case the snprintf won't
> > compile on a particular platform.
> > 
> This is a Good Thing.
> 

If we provide a snprintf(), it _better_ work and compile. What's
the sense of rewriting code to us snprintf() when our failsafe for
snprintf() is a wrapper around sprintf()? :)

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message