httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: snprintf()
Date Tue, 07 Jan 1997 11:12:27 GMT
Chuck Murcko wrote:
> 
> Marc Slemko liltingly intones:
> > 
> > There is the one Jim suggested from sendmail (I think) and the one Chuck
> > suggested from xinetd.  The one from xinetd seems to have more features,
> > the one from sendmail would probably be simpler to put in and easier to be
> > sure it won't blow up on many platforms.
> > 
> > I think there is close to 100% agreement to put a snprintf in, but should
> > it be before 1.2?  I asked for opinions on that and didn't get too much
> > back.
> > 
> To make the job of cleaning up potential fixed-length buffer problems
> easier, I'm +1 for this for 1.2. I won't vote on which snprintf() to use,
> since I'm partial, though I will point out there have been less CERT alerts
> about xinetd than about sendmail. 8^)
> 

If the xinetd version is better, then I'm for that. I'll grab the source
and see what I can see about it. I'm using a home-brewed inetd/tcpd
combo so I'm not up on xinetd.

-- 
====================================================================
      Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
     jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
                  "Not the Craw... the CRAW!"

Mime
View raw message