Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) id MAA15199;
 Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bellglobal.com by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.3/V2.0) with
 ESMTP id MAA15190; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 12:40:22 -0800 (PST)
From: rasmus@mail1.bellglobal.com
Received: from inet-dev ([199.243.250.207]) by mail1.bellglobal.com
          (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA5316
          for <new-httpd@hyperreal.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:39:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:41:03 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: rasmus@mail1.bellglobal.com
Subject: Re: Crypto Victory
To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com
In-Reply-To: <199612192019.MAA27105@blacklodge.c2.net>
Message-ID: <ML-2.3.851028063.9318.rasmus@inet-dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@hyperreal.com

>      Unfortunately we don't really know if that's the
> case. hyperreal is in the 9th district, so that does help though.

I understand the legal implications.  All this provides is a legal
precedent.  This may be enough though.  It should certainly discourage
the government from pursuing anybody.  Especially someone as disparate
as the Apache Group.  In the end I think the decision will be Brian's
and Brian's alone unless we take steps to move the distribution site
elsewhere.  Given the nature of the group, Brian and Hyperreal would be
the only solid target of any legal proceedings.

-Rasmus